I encountered a number of issues when looking this information up on the internet. Mainly, there isn't a lot of information aside from a few newspaper articles I was able to find. Since 1976 was the last year that the Crusaders called Cleveland home, it appeared that not many people cared about the team enough to take a photo or write about the team's plight. Subsequently, they would be the second incarnation of the Minnesota Fighting Saints by the time 1977 rolled around. A photo of the Crusaders wearing these armbands may become a "white whale" for this writer.
In any case, there was some dissension among the ranks after the Crusaders gave Gerry Cheevers his walking papers. GM Jack Vivian had criticized his star goaltender by saying that he wasn't providing quality goaltending for the club, and that prompted Cheevers to quit the team. It also didn't help that Cheevers was worried about being paid by the cash-strapped Crusaders as well, but the criticism of his play prompted he and his agent to walk away from the Crusaders. They met with Vivian and team officials, ended the contract held by the Crusaders for Cheevers' services, and Cheevers went back to the Bruins to assist them in their quest for a Stanley Cup.
Secondly, as the team pushed into March playing good hockey, there were reports breaking that team owners of the Crusaders had been in contact with the NHL to bring the struggling Kansas City Chiefs to Cleveland. This, of course, didn't sit well with the players, and they decided to stage a protest against the team's owners for their indiscretions. Losing Gerry Cheevers was a big blow to the team, but they persevered. Losing their jobs? That was something they wouldn't tolerate.
On March 10, 1976, the Crusaders took the ice at the Richfield Coliseum wearing black armbands to protest the actions of team management. Rather than walking out, the team decided to wear their protest on the ice in the form of black armbands. At this point in the season, the Crusaders and Cincinnati Stingers were battling for first-place in the Eastern Division, so none of the players even considered a walk-out with the success they were having on the ice. The armbands, though, would send a message to owner Jay Moore and his staff, and hopefully prompt questions from reporters around the league that would cause Moore to reconsider his options.
It was reported that Moore and Vivian met with the players before the game to ask them to reconsider their black armband protest, but the Crusaders clearly had no interest in taking that advice. GM Jack Vivian resigned the next day after realizing that either the players no longer had faith in him or that his earlier attempt to resign after losing Cheevers may have been the best move. In any case, Vivian's time with the Crusaders was over.
Stranglely, owner Jack Moore stated that the armband protest displayed by the Crusaders actually was good for the team! The discussion that took place before the game apparently was beneficial for both sides, and looked like things would settle down in Cleveland. And that's where this trail goes cold.
I have searched and searched to find out if this was the only game they wore the armbands to no avail. I have looked for images and photographs of the armbands, but if the protest only lasted one game, photos of that game could be few and far between. What I can conclusively say, though, is that the Cleveland Crusaders wore black armbands on March 10, 1976 against the Cincinnati Stingers in a 5-2 win. That conclusion is proven with the newspaper articles linked above.
As for any other teams, I haven't seen many in hockey wear the armband. Do any come to mind? Leave your comments below and link pictures if possible!
Until next time, keep your sticks on the ice!