The Final Two
With the Stanley Cup Finalists set for this year, we're down to two remaining entrants in Survivor: NHL Playoffs. That means we know who will win the two jerseys we have up for grabs, but we still need to find out who will get the option to choose one of the two jerseys. Michaela and Matt will see their two teams play for hockey supremacy in this final set of games, and we'll know who is the ultimate Survivor this season! But there's something else we need to discuss when it comes to this Stanley Cup Final too.
I have seen a handful of reporters who have suggested that a specific goaltender on the Vegas Golden Knights has earned the right to be in the conversation for the Conn Smythe Trophy. While I don't deny the importance of goaltending when it comes to winning, I want to be very clear that any reporter or writer associated with the Professional Hockey Writers' Association (PHWA) that votes for this goalie for the Playoff MVP award should lose their membership in the PHWA.
The last netminder that won was Andrei Vasilevskiy in 2021 with Jonathan Quick being the other most recent winner when he earned the votes in 2012. I'm not against a goaltender winning the award as they do play a big role in the success of any team, but there has to be some morality among the PHWA members when it comes to what was said and presented as evidence against this goaltender during the Hockey Canada trial. Let me be clear: this is not a redemption story.
I am fully aware that many people will disagree with my stance on this, but the Vegas goaltender does not get an opportunity to erase the role he played in the crimes that were committed. There has been zero attempt to own his part in the crimes with which he was charged, there has been zero effort to put in the work to understand the trauma suffered by the victim, and there has been zero work done to show the world he's a better person than who he was in 2018.
"But he was acquitted, Teebz!" is what I hear most of you screaming at your screens, and you're not wrong. The problem is that an acquittal does not prove innocence. All it proves is that the prosecution failed to get a guilty verdict in a trial. And based on all the things that were said and presented in the trial based on Rick Westhead's reporting in We Breed Lions, the Vegas goaltender was handly an innoncent bystander during the night in question in 2018.
In short, don't even bring the netminder up with any sort of redemption. Playing hockey well enough to win does not erase the morally-broken person. Do the right thing, pro hockey writers.
While we're on this topic, the other person who qualifies for a kick upside the head before being mentioned as a Conn Smythe candidate is Brett Howden. I get he's having an excellent playoff performance in this postseason, but I'd be worried about him remembering it if his memory is as bad as he portrayed it to be during the trial. During this testimony, the man sounded like recalling anything from around that 2018 period of time was a chore his brain could not complete.
His testimony included crying, a lot of stammering, and a lot of "I don't remember" due to the concussions and injuries he's received from his hockey career. The Crown presented "18 instances of inconsistency between Howden’s testimony and his previous statements to investigators" which is an incredible amount of memory loss for a person as young as Howden if that memory loss came from the injuries he cited, yet he's still playing hockey with zero health concerns from doctors or medical experts. Make it make sense.
There have been many on social media who have stated that the NHL has allowed alleged criminals play in the league for years before with no one making a big deal about it, and I'm not sure why a history of being morally corrupt is justification to continue being morally corrupt. If we can't change how we think and act to be better, we're doomed as a society. And if we can't demand accountability from all idols and heroes while making their lives uncomfortable until they become accountable for their actions, we've failed as a society.
Neither of their players have ever denied being in the room. Neither of these players have ever denied being, at least, a witness to some of the acts that were committed that night in 2018. Neither of these players have ever apologized to the witness nor taken responsibility for what they did or should have done in that situation. And neither of these players have sought out education or experiences to better understand why they were in the wrong on that fateful night in 2018.
Neither gets credit for being better people because they haven't done the work to prove that an effort was made to be better. In knowing this, drop the redemption arc stories and vote wisely. The PHWA should be able to show some moral integrity once in a while, right?
Until next time, keep your sticks on the ice!
I have seen a handful of reporters who have suggested that a specific goaltender on the Vegas Golden Knights has earned the right to be in the conversation for the Conn Smythe Trophy. While I don't deny the importance of goaltending when it comes to winning, I want to be very clear that any reporter or writer associated with the Professional Hockey Writers' Association (PHWA) that votes for this goalie for the Playoff MVP award should lose their membership in the PHWA.
The last netminder that won was Andrei Vasilevskiy in 2021 with Jonathan Quick being the other most recent winner when he earned the votes in 2012. I'm not against a goaltender winning the award as they do play a big role in the success of any team, but there has to be some morality among the PHWA members when it comes to what was said and presented as evidence against this goaltender during the Hockey Canada trial. Let me be clear: this is not a redemption story.
I am fully aware that many people will disagree with my stance on this, but the Vegas goaltender does not get an opportunity to erase the role he played in the crimes that were committed. There has been zero attempt to own his part in the crimes with which he was charged, there has been zero effort to put in the work to understand the trauma suffered by the victim, and there has been zero work done to show the world he's a better person than who he was in 2018.
"But he was acquitted, Teebz!" is what I hear most of you screaming at your screens, and you're not wrong. The problem is that an acquittal does not prove innocence. All it proves is that the prosecution failed to get a guilty verdict in a trial. And based on all the things that were said and presented in the trial based on Rick Westhead's reporting in We Breed Lions, the Vegas goaltender was handly an innoncent bystander during the night in question in 2018.
In short, don't even bring the netminder up with any sort of redemption. Playing hockey well enough to win does not erase the morally-broken person. Do the right thing, pro hockey writers.
While we're on this topic, the other person who qualifies for a kick upside the head before being mentioned as a Conn Smythe candidate is Brett Howden. I get he's having an excellent playoff performance in this postseason, but I'd be worried about him remembering it if his memory is as bad as he portrayed it to be during the trial. During this testimony, the man sounded like recalling anything from around that 2018 period of time was a chore his brain could not complete.
His testimony included crying, a lot of stammering, and a lot of "I don't remember" due to the concussions and injuries he's received from his hockey career. The Crown presented "18 instances of inconsistency between Howden’s testimony and his previous statements to investigators" which is an incredible amount of memory loss for a person as young as Howden if that memory loss came from the injuries he cited, yet he's still playing hockey with zero health concerns from doctors or medical experts. Make it make sense.
There have been many on social media who have stated that the NHL has allowed alleged criminals play in the league for years before with no one making a big deal about it, and I'm not sure why a history of being morally corrupt is justification to continue being morally corrupt. If we can't change how we think and act to be better, we're doomed as a society. And if we can't demand accountability from all idols and heroes while making their lives uncomfortable until they become accountable for their actions, we've failed as a society.
Neither of their players have ever denied being in the room. Neither of these players have ever denied being, at least, a witness to some of the acts that were committed that night in 2018. Neither of these players have ever apologized to the witness nor taken responsibility for what they did or should have done in that situation. And neither of these players have sought out education or experiences to better understand why they were in the wrong on that fateful night in 2018.
Neither gets credit for being better people because they haven't done the work to prove that an effort was made to be better. In knowing this, drop the redemption arc stories and vote wisely. The PHWA should be able to show some moral integrity once in a while, right?
Until next time, keep your sticks on the ice!












